PortfoliosLab logo
FAST vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between FAST and ^GSPC is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

FAST vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fastenal Company (FAST) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

FAST:

1.05

^GSPC:

0.64

Sortino Ratio

FAST:

1.76

^GSPC:

1.09

Omega Ratio

FAST:

1.22

^GSPC:

1.16

Calmar Ratio

FAST:

1.29

^GSPC:

0.72

Martin Ratio

FAST:

3.79

^GSPC:

2.74

Ulcer Index

FAST:

6.92%

^GSPC:

4.95%

Daily Std Dev

FAST:

25.84%

^GSPC:

19.62%

Max Drawdown

FAST:

-63.43%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

FAST:

-0.46%

^GSPC:

-3.02%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAST achieves a 16.76% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 1.30% return. Over the past 10 years, FAST has outperformed ^GSPC with an annualized return of 17.77%, while ^GSPC has yielded a comparatively lower 10.89% annualized return.


FAST

YTD

16.76%

1M

2.33%

6M

2.58%

1Y

27.78%

5Y*

19.40%

10Y*

17.77%

^GSPC

YTD

1.30%

1M

12.79%

6M

1.49%

1Y

12.35%

5Y*

15.12%

10Y*

10.89%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

FAST vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAST
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FAST is 8383
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FAST is 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FAST is 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FAST is 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FAST is 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FAST is 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 7373
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

FAST vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fastenal Company (FAST) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current FAST Sharpe Ratio is 1.05, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAST and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

FAST vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAST drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAST and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

FAST vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

Fastenal Company (FAST) has a higher volatility of 7.55% compared to S&P 500 (^GSPC) at 5.42%. This indicates that FAST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...